Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Blink III

(Eingestellt am 16. August 2026, 04:39 Uhr von iEtsh)

😉
Blink III
More in the series: Blink I Blink II

4×4 Sudoku
Digits 1–4 in every row, column and 2×2 box.

Arrows
Arrow digits sum to the circle digit.

Column indexer
A marked cell in column X indicates the column where X appears in the row.

Lösungscode: 3rd row

Zuletzt geändert am 16. August 2026, 05:18 Uhr

Gelöst von rocky, claymategirl, jalebc, Kirra, Fisherman, macintux, Symphony, Pioooooo, Testpilot Pirx, GG_70, lifeless, tiuhto, SanFranSam, Mozart40, marcmees, flaemmchen, 13217ABC, Rollo, bebrp, cornuto, JVA, ... KingIsulgard, PeebsPeebsPeebs, Gullie, hannahh, Javantea, dan19, Laje6, tanisho, Dez256, Crul, PippoForte, lockebyproxy, ohnoitsadalek, RickiFerrara, stqrlight618, CaseyM, Jordan Timm, kangilias
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

Zuletzt geändert am 1. September 2026, 12:17 Uhr

am 1. September 2026, 12:15 Uhr von KingIsulgard
01:16s very easy but fun.
Just ditch the column indexer constraint, it is totally unnecessary and just confusing. The puzzle will be more enjoyable without it.

Zuletzt geändert am 19. August 2026, 14:50 Uhr

am 19. August 2026, 14:07 Uhr von RobertBe
This time I didn't like this puzzle very much. If you can't get a 4x4 sudoku unique without using additional constraints, the puzzle is simply not good in my opinion. If you had managed with just the arrows, it would have gotten top notch from me.

______

iEtsh: Hi RobertBe, thanks for your feedback I appreciate every comment or opinion. However, I wanted to use the column indexer rule in this puzzle.. so i decided to let it be the decider in the last-third stage so it becomes the final touch.
I hope I clarified the reason behind the clue.
---
Perhaps you could have used only the column indexer rule and forgo the arrows. That would also earn top notch from me. For me, a good sudoku has a simple rule set, 1 max 2 constraints. And when 2 constraints are used, they have to work together. In this case, the arrows could be solved without any use of the column indexer. But each to their own.

______

iEtsh: Hi again, to be clear I disscuss the fact behind why i used the column indexer I could not care less about the rating stuff because people here don't give ruler-based ratings, and again without it the puzzle would have had 2 solutions, I am only interested in verbal ratings and feedbacks.
Thank you for your opinion, I will indeed put it into consideration!

Zuletzt geändert am 18. August 2026, 07:03 Uhr

am 17. August 2026, 15:26 Uhr von WasabiKoala
Really nice logic!

I've come to appreciate that the rating is not always an indicative of people liking it or not. I believe in general nowadays the rating is always towards the lower end. I think this started because everything was getting 100% always and there wasn't a correct way of ranking the liking of people, and it just now feels that the ratings are always very harsh...

Anyhow, I enjoyed it!

______

iEtsh: Thank your for your honesty and kindness, don't worry.. I couldn't care less honestly, stuff like rating does not matter to me any more

am 17. August 2026, 02:59 Uhr von iEtsh
I’ve honestly lost hope in the ratings people give on this site. I really don’t understand what people base their ratings on here; sometimes it feels like they just click on anything and move on.

I simply cannot understand how a puzzle that can be solved logically in a minute, with absolutely no bifurcation, can possibly deserve the lowest rating.

78% on a puzzle that can be solved in one minute? A minute isn’t even enough time to notice something bothering you in a puzzle.

Sometimes, I genuinely don’t understand people.

Zuletzt geändert am 16. August 2026, 05:47 Uhr

am 16. August 2026, 05:46 Uhr von macintux
Thank you, I love a good 2 minute puzzle.

______

iEtsh: You are welcome!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. August 2026, 05:01 Uhr

am 16. August 2026, 04:59 Uhr von Kirra
Much fun

______

iEtsh: Thanks!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. August 2026, 05:00 Uhr

am 16. August 2026, 04:45 Uhr von rocky
I enjoyed every second of it. And it was indeed measured in seconds, but that's fine!

______

iEtsh: Thank you!

Schwierigkeit:1
Bewertung:79 %
Gelöst:143 mal
Beobachtet:0 mal
ID:000UDT

Rätselvariante Variantenkombination

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden