Lösungscode: The astrolabe index sequence that starts and ends with the astrolabe that contains the 1. (If the 1 astrolabe indexes the 6, and the 6 indexes the 8, and the 8 indexes the 1, then the sequence would be 1681 for the solution code.)
am 22. November 2025, 20:52 Uhr von QuiltyAsCharged
Astounding! I got stuck and had to put this puzzle aside. Today I came back and found the way through, and it's so satisfying to discover
am 15. November 2025, 08:19 Uhr von Norkas
A lot of unique logic in this one. Loved it.
am 3. November 2025, 19:47 Uhr von thephantomplayer
Took me forever to break through but very good solve path once I did. Very hard but very satisfying.
am 31. Oktober 2025, 03:28 Uhr von Lyouke
The example also has all astrolabes indexed by another astrolabe. Is this some that’s meant to be in the rules too?
- I misunderstood what you were asking and have clarified the rules. - Sotehr
am 30. Oktober 2025, 19:19 Uhr von ViKingPrime
This puzzle feels so unique in its thinking and so interesting to unwind. An incredible challenge but very rewarding. The logic, the aesthetics... everything, you've really outdone yourself with this.
am 30. Oktober 2025, 19:11 Uhr von eladv
what a fun ruleset and execution! Thank you Sotehr!
I loved that there was intricate logic that needed finding out, but not a lot of sudoku needed: mostly just needing to think carefully. For me it was a solid 4*: lots of thinking needed, but I was never quite stuck, and always could make progress if I just thought about what the next deduction might look like. (Then there was a bout of sudoku coming all at once near the end, but it was lovely since it was easy sudoku and just allowed to disambiguate things). This is really my favorite type of puzzle, and among those, it's one of the most fun ones I've solved.
One comment: the solution code description confused me a ton. I couldn't figure out what "the disjoint 2" refers to, and what "the sequence of astrolabe indexing" means. I now understand the solution code, but to me it seems way too confusing even if it's part of the riddle of the puzzle.
am 30. Oktober 2025, 16:40 Uhr von ChinStrap
A lot to internalize but the path felt very well designed and purposeful. You can tell when you've got it. Great addition to the series.
am 30. Oktober 2025, 02:40 Uhr von yellow
very cool!
i assumed that every astrolabe contains a different digit because it was this way in your example although it is not mentioned clearly in the rules.
thanks for setting
- That was a rule that got lost in the many, many revisions. I have re-added it, thank you for bringing it to my attention! - Sotehr