Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

am 4. September 2025, 14:33 Uhr von Plok
Updated description to say it is a non-consecutive sudoku. Sorry for the inconvenience. Completely missed the typo.

am 4. September 2025, 14:20 Uhr von abihummel
Please edit the puzzle description and the rules on SudokuPad to reflect that this IS a sudoku puzzle. I shouldn't have had to go to the comments to confirm that.

am 4. September 2025, 08:45 Uhr von Decapod
For those who are thrown off by the description saying, "This is just a simple non-sudoku puzzle.":
Standard sudoku rules DO APPLY. It *is* a sudoku puzzle. Once you realize that, it's very nice and well-constructed.

am 3. September 2025, 20:11 Uhr von Plok
Removed puzzle variant checkmark. I thought that meant sudoku variant, but is interpreted as non-sudoku. My bad ;-)

am 3. September 2025, 08:09 Uhr von SudokuFan
antiknight+antiking is a dead horse at this point, only one solution up to digit relabeling, rotations and reflections without nonconsecutive or any clues

am 3. September 2025, 05:20 Uhr von Karitsu
This follows sudoku rules. I think perhaps you meant “variant sudoku” instead of “non-sudoku”.

Many thanks for a three digit solution code. I wish that was the standard for all constructors!

am 3. September 2025, 03:10 Uhr von Fisherman
All my votes are yes. Yes for sudoku, for niceness, and for approachable.

am 3. September 2025, 02:15 Uhr von Kirra
Nice puzzle.
Since it follows classic sudoku rules plus some bonus constraints I would be inclined to call it a variant sudoku as opposed to a non-sudoku.

am 3. September 2025, 00:17 Uhr von tjorse
Why is this called a "non-sudoku"?
Standard sudoku rules clearly apply and are required to solve it.

am 2. September 2025, 23:52 Uhr von EmX68
Nice little snack!