Solution code: column 6 top to bottom with x inserted for region borders
example: 123x45x789
today, 09:20 by wullemuus
Phew!
Congrats to this really creative and brilliant use of two of my favourite rulesets: Doppelgänger and CC. The combination with the arrows and esp. the IC cells led to unexpected and really intricate deductions. Without your solution guide I wouldn't have fully understood the implications of this, (esp. that every zero codes for one region number) so I solved the example puzzles twice to get familiar with it. What a beautiful logic inside! Hopefully you use these combination of rulesets again!
yesterday, 18:54 by kingoffries
1200+ minutes... Without a doubt the most time I have ever spent on any puzzle. Lost and Found finale... Derezzed... Stationary Loop Deconstruction (1-9)... I may have spent more time on this puzzle than the previous 2 or 3 hardest puzzles combined.
I was on the right track too. I had it almost cracked, but made one miscalculation and broke the whole thing. I reworked this puzzle from the beginning three times only to arrive at the same spot. But once I found it... Good heavens! What a brilliant puzzle! I found myself almost as in love as with one of my own. Almost as frustrated as trying to get a brilliant concept to finally work. Andrewsarchus, you have done it again! Thanks for the pointer on CTC. For anyone who loves an intense and treacherous 5 star masterpiece, push through this one to the end.
on 25. July 2025, 23:20 by PierreTombal
That was quite brutal. 600 minutes in I had exactly 6 digits identified. Hadn't actually spent all that time on the puzzle and as I had trouble interpreting the rules done the example in between too, but that only gave me a hand full of very tiny additional hints for the main puzzle. After about 1000 minutes on the clock (quite likely a real 6 hours by then) I thought I had the break in I needed, and then the rules stated that I had to copy a region ID to a column remainder and it instantly broke another region which was meant to miss another digit. I wasn't far off though. I had misplaced just one region border line, but except for the conflict I'm fairly clueless how I was supposed to logically determine that I was meant to go that way.
-------
Thanks for the persistence.
If you're curious about the intended solution path, the hidden comment at the bottom of the page contains a link to my solution guide (PDF file).
on 24. July 2025, 21:06 by Playmaker6174
Anyway, I may admit that this is perhaps the most well telegraphed doppelganger puzzle I've solved so far despite my usual struggle of scanning with it. Even though it took me just over 5 hours of solving, not a single part ever really felt brutal or unfair for me at all, but I had to really concentrate well on certain parts throughout the solve, especially the negative constraint and the region numbers.
If anything, the coordinate arrows were definitely the most vital part of the solve and they really help controlling my thought process between different parts during the solve.
on 24. July 2025, 21:04 by Playmaker6174
Super proud of myself to be among the earliest solvers to conquer this entire wonderful pandemonic creation x)
I highly recommend giving that nice 7x7 example puzzle a try first to wrap your mind around the entire concept and how to get used of the scanning methods.
on 24. July 2025, 02:43 by bodemeister
Very nice construction! Lots of fun stuff packed into here. Took me a little while to fully grasp how important the negative constraints are, but there's always enough information available to proceed to the next step. And always good to see more awesome doppelganger puzzles hitting the puzzle pages! Thanks for the puzzle!
on 23. July 2025, 16:50 by earthpuzzles
Fantastic construction! The rules are perfectly intertwined: close enough to work smoothly together, yet distinct enough in their contributions.
Highly recommend the example puzzle too — I solved it after the full size one, yet the smaller size provided some helpful situations that clarified the approach!
Difficulty: | ![]() |
Rating: | N/A |
Solved: | 10 times |
Observed: | 1 times |
ID: | 000OC7 |
Please note: The German version of this page has changed. It is possible that this page does not contain the latest information.