Solution code: every digit on a renban in reading order followed by the positive diagonal left to right
on 9. April 2025, 18:24 by sujoyku
I have nothing against an 18 digits solution code. (I am normally not requiring it anymore in my own puzzles, but it is quickly copied over.) But this code felt unnecessary. The puzzle itself was cool though. Thank you for the non-con fun, isajo4002!
on 31. March 2025, 12:40 by cyddrdrd
Good puzzle but this one is obviously beyond itself. Hate meaningless and unfriendly discussion on solution code.
on 31. March 2025, 06:29 by psninn
Nice puzzle.
Five minutes for solving, half an hour for code.
on 31. March 2025, 05:32 by lootyloot
fun one!
on 30. March 2025, 12:20 by xocolatl
I wish I had read the solution code before I bothered with this puzzle. I am not working that hard just to mark this as done.
Otherwise it was fun, even though I didn't use the renban in box 1
on 30. March 2025, 11:21 by Mozart40
Nice puzzle, I had fun.
Regarding the solution code topic: I only play on my mobile phone, and long solution codes are just annoying to type in, because of always changing browser tabs. Apart from that, I don't see the advantage. Anyone who wants to cheat can do so anyway.
on 29. March 2025, 22:34 by apendleton
"in reading order" seems to mean top bottom and left to right, so like, r1c3,r2c2,r3c1,r4c6,r5c4,etc. Agreed though that it seems more complicated than necessary.
-
I do this so people who solve my puzzles hopefully stop complaining about having to put a row and column. It's annoying to see my puzzles get downrated for something so stupid as having 18 digits.
on 29. March 2025, 20:36 by slowbiex
quick and easy. first half, then probably a 2,5 difficulty.
thx. for setting
on 29. March 2025, 20:07 by GorgeousNicko
Is this kind of complex solution code truly necessary?
-
Yes. people complain too much about 18 digit solution codes so if I make these codes truly complex hopefully I stop getting complaints from everyone.
Isaiah.
on 29. March 2025, 19:56 by Killer-Ly
Need some help with the code too.
Thanks
on 29. March 2025, 19:51 by damo_89
Lovely flow for a non consecutive puzzle, I would say 2*.
on 29. March 2025, 19:42 by boredwillow
I can't figure out what you mean by "in reading order" for the solution code. Help?
Difficulty: | ![]() |
Rating: | 73 % |
Solved: | 68 times |
Observed: | 3 times |
ID: | 000MN2 |
Please note: The German version of this page has changed. It is possible that this page does not contain the latest information.