Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Gurth - the Camel King

(Eingestellt am 1. September 2023, 15:16 Uhr von frankpujo)

Theme

The new King has been crowned: Gurth, the camel! This Caligula-like move might seem absurd, but Gurth is actually a very responsible king: with just some restrictions he has managed to make the kingdom surprisingly orderly and, dare I say, symmetric!

Ruleset
  • Anti-Camel: digits separated by a "camel move" (3-1 movement: 3 cells in a direction and then 1 cell in an orthogonal direction from there) may not be equal (the "camel" denomination was inspired by Scruffamudda's Sudoku Safari";
  • Anti-King: digits separated by a king move in chess (adjacent orthogonally or diagonally) may not be equal;
  • Greater then: the cells separated by the ">" symbol are one greater than the other according to the sign's direction;
  • White kropki (with negative constraint): cells separated by a white dot contain consecutive digits;
  • German whisper: the green line in box1 is a german whisper, so adjacent cells along the line have a difference of at least 5.

Solve online at: F-Puzzles

Lösungscode: Row 8 followed by box 6 (18 digits with no space)

Zuletzt geändert am 7. September 2023, 22:31 Uhr

Gelöst von Greg, ElChiglia, oshitada, NotThatKindOfDoctor, dodomos, SKORP17, Wahaj, jalebc, chenws, danmeehan91324, lmdemasi, Dermerlin, Nairi, flaemmchen, rcg, Pär, geronimo92, Raistlen, Banana, Crul, drf93, ... gdits, zrbakhtiar, ParaNox, PinkNickels, VeTaurus, Zacbelle, JSmoove1099, saskia-daniela, Thomster, stonetim, PippoForte, Uhu, GorgeousNicko, Nonio7, pepe74287, Kirra, RadchenkoAleksandr
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 31. Dezember 2024, 12:19 Uhr von abadx
ctc link: https://sudokupad.app/cbcnsxk3nm

am 7. September 2023, 22:31 Uhr von frankpujo
Removed Gurth's Theorem rule as it is not necessary to the solve.

am 7. September 2023, 22:24 Uhr von frankpujo
That's right, it's not necessary. I initially believed it would have been a bit too hard (for my likings and my objective with the puzzle) to solve without it, but after a closer look I was completely wrong about it. I'm therefore changing the ruleset, thanks!

am 2. September 2023, 12:38 Uhr von geronimo92
Sorry but the Gurth's theorem is not necessary at all to solve this...

Schwierigkeit:1
Bewertung:72 %
Gelöst:54 mal
Beobachtet:19 mal
ID:000F0F

Rätselvariante Variantenkombination Neu Online-Solving-Tool

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden