Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Calvary

(Eingestellt am 3. Mai 2023, 08:30 Uhr von Fool on Hill)

Puzzle rules

Normal Sudoku rules apply.

On a green line adjacent digits must differ by at least 5 (standard German whisper)

If two digits are separated by a black dot, one must be twice the other (partial Kropki - not all dots are necessarily given)

The digits in a cage may not repeat and must sum to the total given in the top left corner.

Here is the Cracking the Cryptic link: Calvary

Here it is on F-Puzzles: Calvary

Lösungscode: Row 1

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 15:20 Uhr

Gelöst von by81996672, timyoth, SXH, Count Knersis, wilsig, pepe74287, LehanLehan, MacZidane, ArnulfKoch, benisjammin, flipping, Matti64, T1geR, WatermeRen, cbjenkins, apendleton, VeTaurus, zorant, pepu273, ... cascadeshiker, cornuto, lmdemasi, redrix, moss, rexxk, PippoForte, Mathemagier, tretro, owler, likeagrapefruit, rhodri, radium, Johannes Quack, Wenni, Felis_Timon, ChampionAsh5357, k2u5as
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 29. Dezember 2023, 22:25 Uhr von tretro
Wow, what an aventure ride. Consistently challenging until the very end. Thanks a lot

am 8. September 2023, 23:07 Uhr von cascadeshiker
Thanks. A perfect level of difficulty for me. I resolved the Kropki dots and the whisper polarity fairly quickly, but then struggled to actually complete the puzzle.

Zuletzt geändert am 25. Juli 2023, 10:18 Uhr

am 25. Juli 2023, 10:18 Uhr von phs
Great composition!! And enjoyable solve, difficult enough but not too much. Thanks.

Zuletzt geändert am 15. Mai 2023, 23:13 Uhr

am 15. Mai 2023, 19:28 Uhr von Orpheus
Neat puzzle, I really enjoyed the play between the lines.

Thank you!

Zuletzt geändert am 8. Mai 2023, 19:29 Uhr

am 8. Mai 2023, 13:43 Uhr von tutuism
uwu

Thank you. Glad you enjoyed.

Zuletzt geändert am 8. Mai 2023, 08:57 Uhr

am 8. Mai 2023, 01:24 Uhr von 99%Sneaky
Fun puzzle, I enjoyed coming back to where I started near the end of the solve.

Thanks for the comment. Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 6. Mai 2023, 16:58 Uhr

am 6. Mai 2023, 16:39 Uhr von Hydalin
For people who are used to these constraints it is quite easy, but I guess 2* is fine :)
For me it was 23 minutes during lunch :D

Thank you for giving it a go. I am getting a bit better at setting easier puzzles, but not at rating them ...

Zuletzt geändert am 6. Mai 2023, 07:09 Uhr

am 6. Mai 2023, 01:24 Uhr von MarthaB
Fun puzzle.

Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 5. Mai 2023, 07:16 Uhr

am 5. Mai 2023, 00:21 Uhr von Onkel_Dagobert
I find it funny that people apparently can‘t agree what the difficulty of this puzzle is. Usually, the puzzles on this site are a bit harder for me than for most, but I found this one really easy.

Thank you for the comment. I think some people are not quite expecting the relationship between cells which emerges, and others see it straight away as a natural deduction.

Zuletzt geändert am 4. Mai 2023, 21:50 Uhr

am 4. Mai 2023, 21:32 Uhr von peep50183
I enjoyed this greatly; it started out easy but then the subtle steps started to appear :) I found this about a 2-2.5*.

Thanks so much for the comment. I will perhaps persist in setting controversial intermediate puzzles ...

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 22:41 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 22:35 Uhr von HumanBirdsong
Lovely construction!

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 21:44 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 21:35 Uhr von Tingo
Very enjoyable solve. Thanks for setting and sharing!

Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for the comment.

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 17:38 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 17:29 Uhr von Montikulum
Fun riddle - from my point of view 3/5 difficulty.

Thank you - glad you enjoyed it. As you can see there has been a variety of comment on difficulty - I put it at 3/35 to start with, but quite a number of people were finding it easier. Thanks for giving voice to the minority!

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 14:37 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 14:35 Uhr von PinkNickels
Would rate this about 1.8 stars. Nice setting, solid puzzle.

Thank you. I had hoped it would be on the easier side. I very easily underestimate the difficulty of my puzzles.
I'm glad you liked it.

am 3. Mai 2023, 11:42 Uhr von WatermeRen
I think 2 star is definitely more appropriate than the 3 it was when I started, considering I'm usually not able the do 3 stars within an hour

am 3. Mai 2023, 11:06 Uhr von Fool on Hill
Change to 2*/5

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 11:05 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 10:56 Uhr von ArnulfKoch
Very nice, but a little bit too easy (between 1 Star and 2 Star)

Thank you - I thought easier, but at least one good solver who tested it found one step hard to see. I will put it down to 2*

Schwierigkeit:2
Bewertung:91 %
Gelöst:255 mal
Beobachtet:3 mal
ID:000DSC

Variantenkombination

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden