Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Count me out ! [Deconstruction]

(Eingestellt am 14. April 2023, 01:18 Uhr von Christounet)

Following my previous 11x11 deconstruction puzzle counting cells in regions, I thought I would try and make one counting cells outside regions !

This serie also includes puzzles involving dots, german whispers, position sums and thermos.


Rules :

- Normal sudoku deconstruction apply : Fill the grid with nine non-overlapping 3x3 square regions, such that each region contains the digits 1-9 once each and no digit repeats in any row or column. Cells outside regions do not contain digits.

- Arrow clues : if a cell with one or more arrows is in a region, its digit is equal to the total number of empty cells (without digits) that appear in the grid in the indicated directions combined.

The puzzle :

Penpa

Sudokupad


Difficulty should be a bit higher than the previous one, around 3-4/5, depending if you are familiar with deconstruction and irregular sudoku or not. If you have trouble visualizing line of sights of certain clues at some point, I suggest using the line tool to draw them and facilitate the count. Note : the rule of leftovers can be used but is not necessary here. Do as you please !

Enjoy ! And consider leaving a comment if you appreciate the puzzle !

You can check out my other puzzles here if you liked this one.

Lösungscode: Row 10 of the grid, all digits, X for empty cells.

Zuletzt geändert am 4. April 2024, 09:11 Uhr

Gelöst von Steven R, h5663454, Paquet Voleur, karlmortenlunna, GabePuzzles, AvonD, Leaub, Jaych, jkuo7, francklg88, Koalagator2, tuturitu, heliosfant, DVFrank, madhupt, alwaysbcoding, bansalsaab, misko, ... lerroyy, polar, Mr_tn, BloodbuzzCorio, cdwg2000, Agent, zhall12570, Silverstep, Tom-dz, MorganLeah, Tacosian, Bellsita, cat, dunder, Paletron, Sewerin, zakkai, SterlingWest, Las4one, Unknown
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 18:13 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 17:55 Uhr von Silverstep
As stated by others, this puzzle is easier than it looks. I'd put it at low 3/5 for difficulty. There are no advanced techniques, and each step requires very short lookahead.

I did it in subfifty ;)
---
@Silverstep : As you can read in the description, I also estimated it around 3-4/5, but it got rated higher by some solvers. Don't know what subfifty means. I hope you had a good time solving it nonetheless.

Zuletzt geändert am 30. April 2023, 20:39 Uhr

am 30. April 2023, 20:00 Uhr von Agent
Very nice and original deconstruction logic!
---
@Agent : Thanks ! Glad you liked the puzzle :)

Zuletzt geändert am 22. April 2023, 22:18 Uhr

am 22. April 2023, 10:25 Uhr von BloodbuzzCorio
Christounet great puzzle! I did rate it 5 stars for difficulty - certainly all of the logic was fair and very rewarding, but I had to work hard for quite a few of the steps to reveal themselves!
---
@BloodbuzzCorio : Thanks, I'm glad you got through despite the difficulties you encountered. Diagonal scanning did make it quite challenging at some steps, which is why I advised to use the line tool to help with lines of sight. The other one I set counthing cells inside regions was definitely easier regarding exploration.

Zuletzt geändert am 17. April 2023, 15:58 Uhr

am 17. April 2023, 15:47 Uhr von peacherwu2
What a beauty! Very original!
---
@peacherwu2 : Thanks ! Glad you found this original :)

Zuletzt geändert am 16. April 2023, 11:21 Uhr

am 15. April 2023, 14:00 Uhr von heliosfant
Thank you so much for this great puzzle. Your deconstruction ones are the best of the best.
---
@heliosfant : Thanks, I feel really rewarded by that kind comment.
You should try these 2 if you havent't already : 000DG3 and 000D3V
Also, check out the last one from tallcat !

Zuletzt geändert am 16. April 2023, 11:12 Uhr

am 14. April 2023, 16:11 Uhr von karlmortenlunna
Very nice and tricky puzzle.
---
@karlmortenlunna : Thanks ! Glad you liked it.

Zuletzt geändert am 14. April 2023, 15:09 Uhr

am 14. April 2023, 14:41 Uhr von Paquet Voleur
Might be me or the puzzle, but I found this one to be a lot trickier than its Count Me In counterpart. I kept overlooking possibilities, reducing options in known cells based on values in posible cells, forgetting scenarios & ruling out cells that could have been included, and other such entertaining errors that made this puzzle quite a journey. I put five stars for difficulty, but I realize I might be the problem. Very satisfying once the proper path has been found (without using the rule of leftovers, once again: I should probably pay more attention). Thanks for setting and sharing!
---
@ Paquet Voleur : It is true that this one is a lot trickier than the previous one ! I purposefully decided to rely a lot less on the usual "fixed" cells of the 11x11 grid for the key deductions, which makes it less obvious where you have to look, but there's definitely a logical path, and I'm glad you made it through with satisfaction !

Schwierigkeit:5
Bewertung:99 %
Gelöst:41 mal
Beobachtet:5 mal
ID:000DKQ

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden