Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

No Prompt

(Eingestellt am 5. April 2023, 00:42 Uhr von Scojo)

This puzzle was originally set in August 2022 for the Cracking the Cryptic Discord's monthly prompt of "No Prompt."

Rules:
  • Normal sudoku rules apply, but use the letters L-T rather than the digits 1-9. ("Enable Letter Tool" should be turned on in the settings.)
  • The word "PROMPT" may not be formed horizontally or vertically anywhere in the grid.

Solve in CTC

Lösungscode: Row 4 (ALL CAPS)


Gelöst von MontanaPearl, Lozzo, RaTheGod1, cbjenkins, metacom, nmmc123, XhcnoirX, saskia-daniela, cornuto, Stargazing Albatross, philcharron7, SKORP17, lutzreimer, jalebc, hannahh, TeamSchmidt, AvonD, asver, ... Csmith928, night83, Drawoon, Hatgurl, RickiFerrara, karlmortenlunna, snaiks, puzzler05, unlogical, Zedarflight , Supertaster, Malsted, Lorena, Jastucreudo, ciaragst, Matthew Humphrey, asynchronous
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 3. Juli 2024, 20:10 Uhr von uvo
Another fun fact: This is exactly what the previous comment said.

am 3. Juli 2024, 16:38 Uhr von Drawoon
fun fact: you don't need to use all caps in the solution code.

am 9. Mai 2023, 22:07 Uhr von Rollo
Nice puzzle.
Btw: You need not mention (ALL CAPS), all letters are automatically converted to upper case.

am 17. April 2023, 08:08 Uhr von asp1310
Sadly this isn't solvable on mobile as we can only use A-I and O on the CTC app.

am 5. April 2023, 18:02 Uhr von Scojo
A little bit of explanation: usually the monthly prompt from this discord channel is a well thought out, intriguing idea that I try my best to build a serious puzzle for. For whatever reason this month they told us "No Prompt" and instead told us a mysterious story about a fisherman. Everyone took that opportunity to post joke puzzles, and this was mine. The idea of just having a boring classic sudoku obscured by rules that didn't make any difference to the solve was really funny to me, so that's what this is.

am 5. April 2023, 16:31 Uhr von philcharron7
Second rule would never even work since there would be 2 P's vertically or horizontally, breaking the first rule.

am 5. April 2023, 12:42 Uhr von XhcnoirX
I agree with RaTheGod1, the 2nd rule isn't needed to solve this. It would have been a better puzzle had it actually been the case.

Schwierigkeit:1
Bewertung:61 %
Gelöst:101 mal
Beobachtet:8 mal
ID:000DEP

Standardrätsel Online-Solving-Tool

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden