Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Earthquake in Sudokutown

(Eingestellt am 8. Januar 2021, 16:16 Uhr von PrimeWeasel)


My friends, there has been an earthquake in Sudokutown.
In the epicentre was a read-out of 9.0 on the scale of Richter.

Earthquake Sudoku Rules apply.

All cages are both Richterscale read-outs (like 6.8 or 4.1, for instance) and regular Killer sudoku cages. These read-outs are read from left to right, or top to bottom. Read-outs can not be repeated in cages.

Furthermore, there are 4 rings around the epicentre where read-outs are done. Read-outs in rings closer to the epicentre must be higher in value than those in rings further away from the epicentre.

F-puzzle

CTC

This is a new concept. Let me know if you see room for improvement or if something is unclear. I haven't made the puzzle too hard, there are several ways to get to a solution logically, I think. Hidden comments on how you did are much appreciated.

Lösungscode: Column 7, Row 7

Zuletzt geändert am 15. November 2022, 00:11 Uhr

Gelöst von bigger, Wecoc, rimodech, john9, kroutu, Kabuki73, SKORP17, soroush, RJBlarmo, washyleopard, chuffinora, Sktx, ManuH, marcmees, michaal94, smckinley, panthchesh, grothar, Fedo , Nothere, moss, Erwin, ... akodi, Studernaldo, Taratang, zrbakhtiar, Terrapin, fishlovescat, Lovejoy , martin1456, Bobbobert, rav, kiwi0710, godoffours, effervescentblizzard, asii, radium, pisiform, Andrewmi3, Kallor
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

Zuletzt geändert am 15. November 2022, 01:16 Uhr

am 14. November 2022, 23:47 Uhr von Mr.CHEN
Can add a CTC link?
''Read-outs in rings closer to the epicentre must be higher in value than those in rings further away from the epicentre.''
What does this sentence mean? Is the lowest richterscale on the inner circle higher than the highest richterscale on the outer circle? (For example, R4C4 must be greater than R3C6?)

~ Yes that's what it means. If R4C4 would be let's say 6.3, then all the read-outs on the next ring have to be lower than 6.3. I've added a CTC-link with the rings drawn.

Can add CTC links to other puzzles in this series? Other previously uploaded puzzles can also be used (although this is troublesome).

Zuletzt geändert am 18. August 2022, 11:04 Uhr

am 16. August 2022, 13:00 Uhr von Rollo
Very nice concept.

~ Thanks Rollo!

am 17. September 2021, 21:03 Uhr von Hausigel_mod
Labels changed

am 18. Juli 2021, 15:46 Uhr von Piatato
Great idea! I'm looking forward to giving the second one a try!

am 23. Mai 2021, 10:04 Uhr von Zombie Hunter
Great concept. Hope to never see a magnitude 5V0 again. lots of fun

Zuletzt geändert am 7. Mai 2021, 04:21 Uhr

am 4. Mai 2021, 18:38 Uhr von henrypijames
Totally forgot the "Read-outs can not be repeated in cages" rule and didn't need it for the solve.

~ For 1 and 2 star solves I don't make a narrow solve path. There are indeed several ways to get there. Besides that, this was the first earthquake and it was an introduction to the concept. More experienced solvers are likely to find a different way to get to 81 digits. The dutch bouldering champion climbs at my gym and skips a lot of the holds on the hardest routes, whereas I am likely to end up rupturing my tendon or falling gracelessly on the floor if I were to try that.

>> My comment wasn't a critique, I was answering your call specifically on how everyone solves this puzzle: I did it without using that constraint (but for the subsequent puzzles in this series I did use it).

am 5. Februar 2021, 23:25 Uhr von askel083
That was fun! A couple of self-induced false starts but I got there in the end! Thanks for the puzzle!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 23:03 Uhr

am 16. Januar 2021, 22:16 Uhr von cam
Great idea and fun puzzle! I appreciate that you started with an easy one, but I hope you decide to make more. I think there's a lot left to explore with this concept!

~ #2 is already here! It's way tougher though...

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 23:02 Uhr

am 16. Januar 2021, 12:51 Uhr von rachelushy
What a great puzzle! Very nice concept, the solve was very linear and pleasant, I enjoyed it immensly

~Glad you liked it!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 23:01 Uhr

am 12. Januar 2021, 00:27 Uhr von bravo-lemur
Interesting concept!

~Thanks!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 23:01 Uhr

am 11. Januar 2021, 04:17 Uhr von panthchesh
I like the concept! Thanks for the puzzle! :D

~you're welcome!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 22:55 Uhr

am 10. Januar 2021, 09:54 Uhr von marcmees
nice idea

~Thanks Marc!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 22:54 Uhr

am 9. Januar 2021, 01:09 Uhr von SKORP17
wirklich gute Idee!

~Danke schön SKORP!

Zuletzt geändert am 16. Januar 2021, 22:53 Uhr

am 8. Januar 2021, 22:25 Uhr von Kabuki73
Nice idea and interesting solve!

~Thanks!

Zuletzt geändert am 8. Januar 2021, 20:34 Uhr

am 8. Januar 2021, 18:09 Uhr von Wecoc
I'm glad there weren't skyscrapers nearby, that could've been a disaster...

~ well, well, now there's an interesting thought

Schwierigkeit:2
Bewertung:93 %
Gelöst:104 mal
Beobachtet:6 mal
ID:00054C

Variantenkombination Online-Solving-Tool

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden