Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

A Strange Sequence

(Eingestellt am 19. September 2010, 20:25 Uhr von zhergan)

All the numbers in the given sequence satisfies a rule. What must be the next three numbers in the following ascending sequence?



















1 - 8 - 11 - 18 - 21 - 28 - 31 - 38 - 41 - 48 - 51 - 58 - 61 - 68 - 71 - 78 - ? - ? - ?



Hint: The missing three numbers are not 81, 88 and 91. It will be too easy otherwise. But it is still not too hard;)

Lösungscode: Enter the three missing numbers respectively.

Zuletzt geändert am 20. September 2010, 22:24 Uhr

Gelöst von martin1456, Antarez, Javier Rebottaro, Toastbrot, ibag, StefanSch, pokerke, zuzanina, uvo, berni, Mody, Luigi, Hausigel, Realshaggy, Rollie, Alex, Le Ahcim, flaemmchen, CHalb, Rollo, vkurt, pin7guin, ... relzzup, MITn3rd, dm_litv, Mars, ManuH, joyal, Dandelo, matter, deu, zorant, Skinny Norris, hopppe, saskia-daniela, Zzzyxas, PRW, tuace, fridgrer, Carolin, RobertBe, Matt, Joe Average, Mathi
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 21. September 2010, 11:32 Uhr von Realshaggy
Another "obvious" solution which is not accepted is 81,88,101. (Same as 81,88,91 but with base 9.)

am 20. September 2010, 22:24 Uhr von zhergan
Also a META label is placed under the puzzle.

am 20. September 2010, 19:03 Uhr von Rollo
Sehr leicht, aha. Toll. Und ich sitz schon 'ne halbe Stunde davor. Wusste gar nicht, dass ich so doof bin.

Zuletzt geändert am 20. September 2010, 17:45 Uhr

am 20. September 2010, 17:45 Uhr von Realshaggy
Also mein Hirn weigert sich irgendwie, bei Existenz einer so offensichtlichen Lösung noch an irgendwas anderes zu denken. Zudem verwirrt mich das Label eher, bei einer englischen Anleitung ist das doch sehr skurril.

am 20. September 2010, 17:42 Uhr von zuzanina
Ich denke, durch den Hinweis "Deutsch benötigt" ist das Rätsel wirklich sehr leicht zu lösen...

am 20. September 2010, 17:07 Uhr von Statistica
I think, if the solution depends on the one who creates the puzzle and not on the "usual" or "common" rules of this kind of puzzle: you have to use the META-Label.

Zuletzt geändert am 20. September 2010, 01:39 Uhr

am 20. September 2010, 00:49 Uhr von uvo
I think the solution IS 81, 88, 91.

If you have another solution in mind, you need to give at least one number that doesn't satisfy the obvious rule. For number sequences, the solution has to be the "simplest" rule that explains all the given numbers; if you arbitrarily forbid the simplest rule, the puzzle becomes in my view just random.

@uvo: Hi Ulrich,

You're right I forbid the "simplest" rule that explains all the given numbers. But I don't think so it is so inappropriate since I indicated that I have another rule other than the "simplest" rule in my mind in the puzzle text. I didn't give at least one number which doesn't satisfy the obvious rule (add 7 then add 3) because if I've done that my puzzle becomes much more simple (I also think that it is also simple with the current version). But I can say that the first one of the next three numbers definitely does not satisfy the "simplest" rule.

I am also giving this as another hint beside the Sprachkenntnisse 'Deutsch' benötigt label I've used previously. I also think that, this label averts this puzzle to be a random one.

Regards,

Zafer

am 19. September 2010, 20:34 Uhr von zhergan
The puzzle text is a little bit changed!

am 19. September 2010, 20:26 Uhr von zhergan
The fonts of the numbers in the sequence is decreased for better visual view.

Schwierigkeit:2
Bewertung:45 %
Gelöst:49 mal
Beobachtet:2 mal
ID:0000Q4

Sprachkenntnisse 'Deutsch' benötigt Metarätsel

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden