Nonconsecutive: Digits orthogonally adjacent to each other are not consecutive.
Antiking: Digits seperated by a kings move in chess can't be the same.
Antiknight: Digits seperated by a knights move in chess can't be the same.
XV: Digits seperated by a V sum to 5, digits seperated by an X sum to 10. All X and V are given.
Thermometers: Digits along a thermometer strictly increase from the bulb to the tip.
Renban Lines: Digits on a pink Renban line form a set of consecutivedigits in any order. Digits do not repeat on Renban lines.
Nabner Lines: Digits on a yellow Nabner line form a set of nonconsecutive digits in any order. Digits do not repeat on Nabner lines.
Black Kropki Dots: Digits seperated by a black kropki dot have a ratio of 1:2. Not all possible Kropki dots are necessarily given.
Note: It’s recommended you disable sudokupads conflict checker since it doesn’t ignore the normal sudoku rules and might mislead you.
Solution code: Column 1 from top to bottom.
on 24. July 2026, 17:18 by hardline35
Thanks for fixing the solution code, I came back 2 days later to check :). This is an original puzzle, very nice. Thank you! I enjoyed the non-sudoku rule
on 24. July 2026, 14:39 by Fisherman
The bite of a scorpion. I found the title entertaining, the ruleset slick, and the puzzle Goodliffy. Approved and appreciated.
on 23. July 2026, 12:53 by NoSkem
Fixed the solution code. Sorry for the confusion. I mixed up two digits. To everyone running into contradictions: normal sudoku rules do NOT apply. If you are using sudokupad for solving you should disable the conflict checker since I couldn't figure out how to make that ignore the base rules.
on 23. July 2026, 10:43 by LLX
solution code not worked
on 23. July 2026, 00:29 by APigthatflys
A lot of people missing the "Normal Sudoku Rules DO NOT apply" line in the rules.
That said, a single instance of broken sudoku just...feels like a copout for an otherwise decent puzzle. Also, as others have mentioned, solution code is broken.
---
Reply: Honestly I feel like that's a fair critique. Originally this resolved to be a completely valid sudoku kind of as a joke to be honest but I felt like that was just boring so I added the one mistake. This was my first ever go at a 9x9 sudoku and I think there is definitely a lot of room for improvement in general.
on 22. July 2026, 23:04 by fergus
It breaks in box 7 - the nabner and renban conflict
on 22. July 2026, 20:51 by Morphismic
Yeah something is not right with this puzzle. I just put two 2s in a box and solution checking says everything is fine.
on 22. July 2026, 19:40 by hardline35
My solution seems correct, but solution code is not accepted
on 22. July 2026, 18:51 by digital_lighting
Solution code is now working. Is a good puzzle. I also neglected to read thoroughly and skipped over the Sudoku rules do not apply. I was able to eventually solve it by doubling up the two in Box 7.
on 22. July 2026, 18:47 by addie
I must be missing something, I keep coming into contradictions. Please let me know any advice or if anyone else is having a similar experience