Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Oh jump twice, another day from 1 to 5

(Published on 3. February 2026, 13:24 by gadgetgreen)

My first puzzle ever. I love these constraints and wanted to try it myself. Feels a bit hard, but should be fine. Enjoy!

Normal Sudoku rules apply (digits 1-9 once each in every row, column and 3x3 box).
Anti-Knight: cells a chess knights move apart may not contain the same digit.
Anti-King: cells a chess kings move apart may not contain the same digit.
Non-Consecutive: Orthogonal adjacent cells can not contain consecutive digits.

Solve on Sudokupad here!

Solution code: Row 1

Last changed on on 3. February 2026, 14:57

Solved by Katuize, luuu, jalebc, bansalsaab, forsen, jguer, Kigor, MeanoPenquino, BenClancy, hardline35, superkinkel, Gullie, Partario, LeaVulpina, dzamie, PinkNickels, SKORP17, cornbread, Qodec, ofsmul, Dean, ... bcreturnee, Julianl, mariban, Tacocat, grunde, itsid, Ragna, QuiltyAsCharged, esumpter, RadchenkoAleksandr, Kabuki73, anthe95, TaeChi, Ecem1903, BellBear, AKropki, Bimatalajati, Mathemagier
Full list

Comments

on 11. February 2026, 19:15 by QuiltyAsCharged
Oh my goodness that was tough! Very cool minimalism.

on 11. February 2026, 15:54 by Ragna
Fun puzzle! Very tricky. Thank you. What a debut!!! :-)

on 6. February 2026, 11:44 by superkinkel
Very nice, but quite difficult. I would rather go with the initial 4 star rating!

on 4. February 2026, 19:50 by Onkel_Dagobert
Puuzles with the (quite common) combination of this ruleset are all the same - the break-in is usually a bit challenging, but after that, it only takes a minute or two to fill in the rest. I personally like the first part more than the second.

on 3. February 2026, 20:38 by cornbread
3* seems about right to me. Very challenging to place the first digit and then it all falls nicely from there.

on 3. February 2026, 20:26 by dzamie
Did take me a bit to place the first digit, but after that it was pretty smooth sailing. Closer to 2* for me, but I've also seen a lot of anti-king/knight/adjacent puzzles.

on 3. February 2026, 19:17 by superkinkel
Very nice, but quite difficult. I would rather go with the initial 4 star rating!

on 3. February 2026, 18:52 by hardline35
Thank you, it was not an easy one.

on 3. February 2026, 14:57 by gadgetgreen
Changed estimated difficulty from 4* to 3*

Difficulty:3
Rating:83 %
Solved:62 times
Observed:1 times
ID:000RA7

Enter solution

Solution code:

Login