Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

WPC Preparation 2019: Loopfinder

(Published on 3. January 2021, 16:23 by pwahs)

I created this puzzle as preparation for a team round of the 2019 WPC (world puzzle championship). It turned out quite a bit harder than the actual competition puzzle. You have been warned ;)

This puzzle consists of 8 loop puzzles, and 7 categories of 4 rules each. Every puzzle will be assigned one rule per category that it has to satisfy, and every rule has to be used by exactly two puzzles. If a puzzle satisfies a rule, it is not allowed to satisfy the other three rules of that category (at least when applied to the whole puzzle; individual clues are allowed to satisfy multiple rules). During the competition, this was not needed for finding the unique solution, but for my puzzle, you should keep it in mind :)

Here the original instructions from the WPC, including an example: Instructions

And here is the puzzle. The arrows to the left of the grids are only used for the solution codes: Puzzle

Solution code: For every puzzle from A to H two numbers: The amount of empty cells and the amount of intersections in the marked row

Last changed on on 5. January 2021, 19:04

Solved by uvo, rubbeng, xiao01wei, tuace, Zzzyxas, moss, CJK, Niverio, moeve, Kideneb, polar, EKBM, Echatsum, zzw
Full list

Comments

on 24. April 2024, 22:07 by zzw
Amazing!! I loved the way the correct rules of each puzzle are gradually revealed, how intricately linked they all are. The clues are minimal, and it's often hard to know where to look, but every step was very reasonable, and interesting too.

I did tear my hair out for a while quadruple-checking everything when my solution code didn't work, because I was misinterpreting "the amount of empty cells" as the total numbers in each entire grid, not just in the marked rows. Kinda dumb in retrospect but that's English for you.

on 24. October 2022, 16:39 by polar
Amazing set of puzzles - thank you!

on 7. January 2021, 13:31 by xiao01wei
Thank you uvo, it is an important rule that I ignore

on 7. January 2021, 11:51 by uvo
xiao01wei, I'm quite sure this puzzle has only one solution. Please re-read the instructions: "If a puzzle satisfies a rule, it is not allowed to satisfy the other three rules of that category."

(My guess is that this rule is what causes your problems.)

on 6. January 2021, 00:00 by rubbeng
I enjoyed!

Last changed on 5. January 2021, 20:19

on 5. January 2021, 20:02 by Dandelo
Oh, Mist! Ich habe Regeln ausgeschlossen, wenn sie keine eindeutige Lösung ergaben...

Edit: Aber nicht bei C. Dafür ging es bei C jetzt plötzlich weiter, wo ich gestern nix mehr gesehen habe.

Last changed on 5. January 2021, 19:06

on 5. January 2021, 19:04 by pwahs
*facepalm*
Changed the solution code back to the first version because I can't count negations...

on 5. January 2021, 18:27 by pwahs
Puzzle C had two solutions, there is an additional clue now: An arrow in the bottom right of row 6/column 7, pointing to the top-left.

on 5. January 2021, 18:17 by pwahs
@rubbeng:
Thanks, you are right, there is a clue missing in C. I'll fix it, but you can take the longer path of your two options for now. Sorry for that.

on 4. January 2021, 01:47 by tuace
Die Originalversion der Teamrunde war in der Tat deutlich schwerer. Ich weiß nicht mehr genau wieviel, aber die hatte bestimmt um die 60 Hinweise weniger.

on 3. January 2021, 23:56 by pwahs
@rubbeng: In 4., both masyu circles can be valid, I think you forgot about a possible intersection?
Also, it's not clear if you meant it that way, but I'll just state it to be sure: If a Geradeweg clue on a turn or intersection is knapp daneben, it can be different values horizontally and vertically.

Last changed on 3. January 2021, 23:30

on 3. January 2021, 23:29 by pwahs
Solution code corrected, I had one digit wrong. Sorry im case anyone already solved it, please try again.

on 3. January 2021, 23:21 by pwahs
@Hidden comment: I watched our teams solving this back in 2019, and the most common mistake was to forget about intersection. E.g. Sometimes two lines that met at 90° turned out to be an intersection after all. Maybe that also happened to you?

Last changed on 3. January 2021, 19:07

on 3. January 2021, 18:59 by Realshaggy
Ulrich meinte beim Team-Testlösen, dass auch die Originalversion der Teamrunde deutlich schwerer war.

on 3. January 2021, 17:54 by sf2l
on, no. not again! it was a nightmare

on 3. January 2021, 17:10 by pwahs
Das originale Wettbewerbsrätsel und die Anleitungsdatei stammen übrigens von Erhard Notz (tuace).

on 3. January 2021, 16:24 by pwahs
Zufällig Rätsel Nr. 6000 im Portal :)

Difficulty:5
Rating:100 %
Solved:14 times
Observed:3 times
ID:000530

Puzzle combination New Large Meta puzzle Multi-grid puzzle Path puzzle Knapp daneben

Enter solution

Solution code:

Login