Probably Good Enough (Nala’s Adventures #34)
(Eingestellt am 14. April 2026, 15:33 Uhr von SandraNala)
In diesem Rätsel schicken wir die beiden Hunde Nala und Henri - den kleinen Cocker der Eltern - zum Staffellauf. Nala fängt an und trägt den Ball zu Henri, der ihn dann übernimmt und zum Ziel bringt damit beide Hunde ihre Kekse bekommen.
Nala ist ein alter Profi und kann alle Hindernisse überwinden. Henri fehlt das Training und er macht leider alles falsch.
Die ausführlichen Regeln findet ihr im (englischsprachigen) link. :)
Viel Spaß!
Klicke hier, um die englische Version von “Probably Good Enough“ zu lösen
Lösungscode: Ziffern aus Spalte 1 (von oben nach unten):
Kommentare
am 4. Mai 2026, 16:55 Uhr von amchap
Fun puzzle. Thanks. I put off solving because the volume of rules were a little intimidating, but I agree that they were all necessary, especially the clarification of wrogn.
am 28. April 2026, 09:04 Uhr von BertieCat
All done! Waiting for the next adventure ...
am 22. April 2026, 17:51 Uhr von croo377
Very nice puzzle. I was confused at the beginning as I was not use to seeing arrow clues in purple.
am 19. April 2026, 23:08 Uhr von BeansInCrocs007
This was fun! it took me a second to understand the Henri rules, but after undoing some stuff it flowed nicely! thanks for a cool puzzle!
am 18. April 2026, 22:39 Uhr von MattJones
Loads of fun. Thank you!
am 17. April 2026, 22:08 Uhr von dzamie
The wrong rules should be better enumerated, imo. As others have pointed out, the "wrogn" type tends to indicate that only *not all* of a clue is correct. As it currently reads, not all of Henri's clues are explained, and it's also a bit harder to read since, unlike Nala's, his aren't in a list.
Sandra here! Yes I hear you. We had long debates about mental load created by a wall of text vs trying to keep it short for the Henri part. Maybe the flaw is the idea of having 2 complete rulesets in one puzzle that both require lengthy explanations. I’m not sure what right or wrong here, but I have learned from it :)
am 16. April 2026, 13:21 Uhr von Snaques
Very fun, but a bit laborious in terms of understanding the rules. Once I truly understood them, it flowed very nicely.
am 15. April 2026, 15:37 Uhr von Jasperrr
The rules and the solution are quite easy, but the sheer amount of rules add enough mental load for me to consider this a clear 2*.
Very nice puzzle regardless, really enjoyed this one. This is where I save my top ratings for!
am 15. April 2026, 05:41 Uhr von Pairot
The wrogn got me once or twice
am 14. April 2026, 20:48 Uhr von SandraNala
Whisper rule adjusted :)
am 14. April 2026, 20:15 Uhr von JVA
If I had a nickel for every sudoku puzzle involving two cute animals in a maze getting a treat at the end I've solved today, I'd have two nickels
am 14. April 2026, 19:55 Uhr von SecondBlue
The updated comment about the wrongness of the german whisper line makes the puzzle impossible to progress. Needs to read that adjacent digits on a wrong green line differ by less than 5. Not 5 or less.
Sandra here! Thank you for the feedback. I thought we had tested this case, but testing again I agree and have adjusted the rules :) much appreciated that you pointed it out!
am 14. April 2026, 19:25 Uhr von Archon
Good puzzle, good dogs. :)
am 14. April 2026, 18:38 Uhr von faltenin
Thanks for the puzzle! I didn't have a problem with the wrongness of the lines as the parity example gave good guidance. I was confused though by the clue about Nala's path went through all dashed cages, but then Henri's cage was dashed, so should it go through or wrong? Anyway I ignored that part and it all worked out :-D
am 14. April 2026, 18:08 Uhr von vitaminz
Great puzzle! But I agree that wrogn needed to be defined here (especially as it goes against my understanding of the convention, which is simply the negation of the clue as a whole, i.e. the clue is invalid so any part of it can be wrong not every part of it).
Sandra here!
Okay I’ll add it then! My understanding was that „standard and wrong“ would read adjacent digits on the whisper line have a difference of 5 or less“, but I don’t want my puzzle to be confusing and rather add it to the rules
am 14. April 2026, 16:56 Uhr von jeffrey.l.byrd19
I found this puzzle enjoyable and straightforward, but I would have appreciated more explanation on what constitutes a “wrogn” clue with regards to the GW lines. In theory one incorrect digit on a whisper line renders the entire line “wrogn.” At one point I made what I would consider to be assumption about the rules to proceed. Perhaps there’s a nuance in the rules that I missed though. Thanks!
Sandra here!
Thank you for the feedback! I felt it particularly tricky to decide between very long rules that are often tiresome to read and keeping it shorter at the possible cost of creating confusion. Not sure what’s the right call here. :)
