Knightless district
(Eingestellt am 16. Oktober 2025, 16:25 Uhr von Sfayne)
Erratum: the original Sudokupad link was missing the sub-rule that digits aren't allowed to repeat in a cage, so a new link with correct rules has been shared
Normal Sudoku rules apply.
- Antiknight: Two identical digits may not be a chess knight’s move apart.
- Killer Cages: Digits in cages must sum to the small clue in the top left of the cage. Digits may not repeat in a cage
- Renban Lines: Digits along a purple line form a set of consecutive numbers in any order.
- German Whisper Lines: Two adjacent digits along a green line must differ by at least 5.
Original Sudokupad link (identical, except it's missing the rule that digits aren't allowed to repeat in a cage)
Lösungscode: Row 1 followed by Column 6 (no space in between)
Kommentare
am 24. Oktober 2025, 09:55 Uhr von snuuba
Closer to 4 stars for me. Logic vice very nice, I really liked how the bottom three boxes interacted. The only downside is too long solution code. Probably the only reason why this puzzle does not have 9x% rating, which it deserves as a puzzle. Many thanks for sharing.
am 19. Oktober 2025, 03:58 Uhr von Sfayne
@adalg Thanks for noticing and sharing the inconsistency. The mistake was in the rules, and this page as well as the Sudokupad pages have been edited accordingly.
am 19. Oktober 2025, 03:52 Uhr von Sfayne
Both this page and the Sudokupad page were missing the standard subrule that digits aren't allowed to repeat in a cage. I edited this page to add the rule, and provided a new Sudokupqd link.
am 18. Oktober 2025, 17:38 Uhr von LeaVulpina
I wonder if I missed something, because I really struggled through last part of the mid-solve, but after that, it was a breeze. Really enjoyed this!
am 18. Oktober 2025, 01:36 Uhr von adalg
I really enjoyed the puzzle. Just in case you weren’t aware of it: In the sudokupad link, digits are prevented from being repeated in a killer cage but this is not stated in the rules.
am 17. Oktober 2025, 16:37 Uhr von BorisTheSnake
Nice solve, but felt harder than a 3*, unless I missed something simple. Also, no need for a complex solution code, I suspect those are the reasons for the low rating.
am 16. Oktober 2025, 22:40 Uhr von ___
very enjoyable solve path. thanks sfayne!
am 16. Oktober 2025, 17:41 Uhr von m0rkoli
Thank you! Lovely puzzle!
