Lösungscode: Box 5, normal reading order.
Heute, 18:00 Uhr von ViKingPrime
A little bit of careful reading here goes a long way. Wonderful use of ambiguity.
am 8. Oktober 2025, 22:37 Uhr von Fra314
Cool puzzle, I constantly forgot about the ambiguity bit and that dragged my solve a tad too much XD. Well done!
am 7. Oktober 2025, 19:47 Uhr von Sotehr
Updated rule wording for clarity.
am 7. Oktober 2025, 19:30 Uhr von sujoyku
Thank you for this fun present, Sotehr! I enjoyed it a lot and learned quite a bit about NRs. It is neat how the widely symmetric (ambiguous) clues resolve.
am 7. Oktober 2025, 19:29 Uhr von Wile E. Coyote
I‘m with Scorps
Because there are two 1-clues, one of them has to be a Up-to-clue.
But how do you build a sum with value one with the digits until digit 1 appears without including it?
I thought it could only be meant to solve in one way (with braking the ruleset), entered it first, used the checker to verify and went on solving.
Was fun from there.
[answer from Sotehr]
- The N in an Up to N-Sum clue is the column/row number, not the digit/sum. So a 2 can't be a row 2 Up to N-Sum clue, but it could be a row 3 Up to N-Sum clue, because it would just be 2 in r3c1 and a 3 in r3c2.
Does that clarify how the Up to N-Sums work? - Sotehr
Edit (Wile E.):
Thanks for clarification.
Got it now. =)
So I missed an additional information from that clue…